In the activity observed, I saw the requests going to:
aunznewl1.com, resolving to 220.127.116.11
aunznewl1.net, did not resolve
Note: It appears in most instances of the malware it tries to beacon to a .com / .net domain pair – but in the cases that I’ve seen only the .com is actually registered. I went ahead and registered the above .net domain and will monitor and update this post with any data I find.
Note: the user id appears to be a historical timestamp (DDMMYYYY_HHMMSS) from 2011, possibly related to the time of infection. The above two URL paths are quick and easy ways of identifying infections in your network – I didn’t see these patterns in EmergingThreats.
Doing Google searches for the above two domains does not reveal much of anything. However, there is some open-source information that can be pulled-in to tie this to an identified malware family:
To start with, there is a “Trojan.Win32.Generic” GFI Sandbox report that identifies HTTP beaconing to the domain pair thausyn2.com and thausyn2.net on the same IP above. Using the MD5 from this report, we can pull a VirusTotal report which shows it to be detected as a Trojan by 19/41 A/V vendors. Doing a bit more digging shows a few additional reports, for example a Malware-Control report from late June 2011 showing that the malware family is frequently classified as “Ambler” or “Amber” Trojan Spy variant – which can steal passwords and log key-strokes. This is an older malware family, and appears to have some ties to Russia. While it is an older malware family, this current variant shows that it is still in use and exhibits some different patterns possibly allowing infections to fly under the radar.
I downloaded a very recent version of malware from one of the involved domains, and it has very poor A/V detection:
V/T report: 4/43
The binary itself ends the file with a series of “PADDINGPADDINGXX” strings … which a quick Google shows some malware reports from Anubis. It appears to be an IRCbot used to further download other malware, such as the Ambler Trojan.
Combining open-source reports along with some DNS information provides this list of suspected domain infrastructure used to support this campaign:
Note: some of the "older" domains used now appear to be re-purposed, for example:
jokesd33.com appears to be a possible work from home / mule scam.